The parameters/meta tagging used to search fonts clearly does not match designer vernacular. Definitely feels like a bunch of techys/engineers designed the parameters. I have 10,000 fonts loaded on my computer and feel like your library lacks compared to mine which I know is not true. But I will choose scrolling through my 10,000 over using adobe fonts search functions most of the time because I do not find success in what I am looking for. the fact that I can only look at like 10 fonts per page, and how fonts are shown is slow and cumbersome. Hate to say it, but dafont does a better job of the initial finds than adobe. Would be great if we could also orgnize some of your fonts into our own folders, those folder could then be shared. IE. "christmas fonts", "Sports FOnts", etc.