20 results found

1. Font syncing needs major improvement

   Adobe fonts is definitely my go-to for high-quality, unique, spot-on fonts and I use it all the time for all kinds of projects.

   However, I'm constantly having syncing issues with adobe fonts. Firstly, when installing, it takes forever for it to activate within the adobe apps. And then, even more frustrating, once it has already been installed, the apps 'forget' and show that it's inactive. I then have to try uninstalling and reinstalling it (which takes a lot of time since it takes forever to sync), and then often have to sign out of adobe completely, restart my computer, and sometimes need to go as far as using the adobe cleaner tool!

   My computer is a solid model, so I don't think my hardware or software is the issue.

   I'd appreciate if the adobe fonts experience can be improved.

   Adobe fonts is definitely my go-to for high-quality, unique, spot-on fonts and I use it all the time for all kinds of projects.

   However, I'm constantly having syncing issues with adobe fonts. Firstly, when installing, it takes forever for it to activate within the adobe apps. And then, even more frustrating, once it has already been installed, the apps 'forget' and show that it's inactive. I then have to try uninstalling and reinstalling it (which takes a lot of time since it takes forever to sync), and then often have to sign out of adobe completely, restart my computer, and… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

2. improvements to the Adobe Fonts session in the Creative Cloud app

   would like to suggest some points of improvement in the Adobe Fonts part within the Creative Cloud desktop application.

   1 - It would be ideal if we could search for fonts by simply typing their name into a search bar, even if only among those that have been added. It's such a simple thing that it doesn't make much sense that it hasn't been implemented yet. Having to access Adobe Fonts via the browser every time to search for a font eats up time.

   2 - Please add a scroll bar that is always visible to the tab within the application. The current one only appears when we scroll and even if we click, it doesn't stay fixed.

   3 - I suggest that in the Adobe Fonts part of the app, they don't show all the weights of the typography if we don't ask for it, or if we don't click on it. It's hard enough to find a font without a search bar, guys. Currently in my application, when I access the Adobe fonts window, all the font options are automatically expanded, making it much more difficult for someone who works with a lot of fonts to find what I need, even in alphabetical order.

   Those are my main ideas, I'd be happy if you thought of them. Thank you

   would like to suggest some points of improvement in the Adobe Fonts part within the Creative Cloud desktop application.

   1 - It would be ideal if we could search for fonts by simply typing their name into a search bar, even if only among those that have been added. It's such a simple thing that it doesn't make much sense that it hasn't been implemented yet. Having to access Adobe Fonts via the browser every time to search for a font eats up time.

   2 - Please add a scroll bar that is always visible to the tab within the… more

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

3. Out of date / misleading explanation for why web fonts must be loaded from use.typekit.net

   Good day, I'm a lead developer at Penn State Outreach Marketing, and I have a proposal for helping improve certain web vitals metrics for users of Adobe fonts. We have found that the use of Adobe fonts is presently a bottleneck for our continued LCP/CLS tuning efforts.

   Adobe's documentation at https://helpx.adobe.com/fonts/using/use-typekit-net.html claims that...

   "The CDN allows your fonts to be cached at many locations around the world, to ensure that they can be delivered to your website visitors as quickly as possible."

   However this isn't always true -- at least not nowadays...

   The use of using an Adobe hosted CSS file in order to load @font-face information will add an additional HTTP roundtrip to the critical rendering path. In order for first paint to occur, unless a font is set to font-display: swap, the user agent must...

   1. Request and parse the DOM response

   2. Request, download, parse, and evaluate the CSS response from https://use.typekit.net/*/*.css

   3. Request, download, and apply the font assets

   For users that are literally optimizing for milliseconds in order to meet Google's Web Vitals thresholds, that extra round-trip is sometimes a deal-breaker.

   Wouldn't a better approach be to eliminate step #2 and allow end-users to embed the @font-faces directly in their DOM responses? That would completely remove font loading from the critical rendering path for users that are using font-display: swap, and greatly reduce the layout shifting impact of users who opt to use font-display: swap.

   HTTP roundtrips on mobile data plans can easily "cost" 600 milliseconds. By offering users the ability to embed the @font-faces directly in the DOM response, still keeping the fonts hosted by Adobe, this seems to be a best of both worlds compromise. The fonts wouldn't need to be "self hosted" by end-users, and end-users wouldn't need to regress on performance in order to use Adobe fonts.

   What would be needed from Adobe? Font binaries hosted on Adobe's servers that have backwards-compatibility guarantees -- meaning that the path to the font would not change.

   What would be needed from End Users? Nothing! It could be an opt-in feature!

   Good day, I'm a lead developer at Penn State Outreach Marketing, and I have a proposal for helping improve certain web vitals metrics for users of Adobe fonts. We have found that the use of Adobe fonts is presently a bottleneck for our continued LCP/CLS tuning efforts.

   Adobe's documentation at https://helpx.adobe.com/fonts/using/use-typekit-net.html claims that...

   "The CDN allows your fonts to be cached at many locations around the world, to ensure that they can be delivered to your website visitors as quickly as possible."

   However this isn't always true -- at least not nowadays...

   The use of using an Adobe hosted CSS… more

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

4. Website breaks on Safari 16.0

   The Adobe Fonts website appears broken on Safari version in 16.0 in Macbook Pro-2014. I know the system is old, yet many users are using old Macbook. In my opinion, it should be fixed. It works well on Chrome.

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   received  ·  0 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

5. Adobe Kis and Aldine should be purchasable on third-party platforms.

   As a lawyer, I own and use Arno and Minion 3 to write briefs, as Adobe makes some of the best text serif families around. However, since my workflow uses Word and other non-Adobe tools, I need to be able to purchase offline font files instead of using the Adobe Fonts platform. Historically, Adobe Originals font families have been purchasable on third-party platforms, like MyFonts or Fontspring. The newest Adobe Originals families, Aldine and Kis, should also be made available to purchase on third-party platforms (perhaps after some period of exclusivity if Adobe wants to promote CC subscriptions).

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   under review  ·  0 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

6. More font categories

   I would love to see font categories for the different decades in graphic art history. For example, common fonts used during the 1950s.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   planned  ·  0 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

7. typo

   "There are a lot of fonts in here! Consider a few less for better performance." is incorrect grammar. It should be:

   "Consider fewer fonts for better performance."

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   received  ·  0 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

8. Printing a list of available Adobe Fonts currently available

   To be able to download either a PDF or to be able to print a list of the Adobe Fonts library. Clients are requesting this daily.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   under review  ·  1 comment  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

9. Integrate Adobe Fonts with the new WordPress Gutenberg editor/designer.

   Hi. There's currently no way to use Adobe Fonts with the new Gutenberg system in WordPress 6.5. That is, unless you add a 3rd party page builder theme.

   As I hear it, they're building an API for their new WP font manager, so work is needed on the Adobe end to plug Adobe Fonts in.

   This is a new / forthcoming issue. They published the release candidate of WP 6.5 a week ago, and before that it was a beta for a while.

   I was asked by Adobe staff to post this here as a reply to a forum question. At that time I was still trying to understand why the instructions that Adobe Fonts gives didn't work.

   While this issue is unsolved, I recommend that you stick a notification on the install instructions page to let people know that these two products are incompatible for the time being.

   This would save everyone a lot of grief, including your customer support staff :)

   Hi. There's currently no way to use Adobe Fonts with the new Gutenberg system in WordPress 6.5. That is, unless you add a 3rd party page builder theme.

   As I hear it, they're building an API for their new WP font manager, so work is needed on the Adobe end to plug Adobe Fonts in.

   This is a new / forthcoming issue. They published the release candidate of WP 6.5 a week ago, and before that it was a beta for a while.

   I was asked by Adobe staff to post this here as a reply to a forum question.… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   under review  ·  0 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

10. Fix Variable Fonts in Webflow.

    Variable font controls are not appearing for those VF that are hosted by Adobe Fonts.
    Google Fonts and fonts you upload yourself work fine. I've tested, using the same font files, and it's an Adobe Fonts issue.

    I don't know if this is something to be fixed on the Webflow side or the Adobe side, but since it's Adobe's product that isn't loading correctly, I hope you lean into the problem and see if you can solve it. I'm sure if you co-operate with Webflow you can solve this swiftly.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    received  ·  1 comment  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

11. Some fonts aren't available in Adobe Portfolio

    Hello Adobe team,

    Hope this message finds you well. I've been utilizing Adobe's tools and services to enhance my creative projects, and I recently encountered a snag that I was hoping to address. While exploring Adobe Portfolio, I noticed that some fonts available in Adobe Fonts aren't accessible.

    In particular, I was hoping to use the 'Gyst Variable' font for one of my projects, but it seems to be missing from the font library in Adobe Portfolio. Could you kindly shed some light on why certain fonts available in Adobe Fonts aren't compatible with Adobe Portfolio? I suspect that the absence of these fonts may be due to their variable font format.
    Are there plans to incorporate variable fonts into Adobe Portfolio?

    Looking forward to hearing your insights.

    Hello Adobe team,

    Hope this message finds you well. I've been utilizing Adobe's tools and services to enhance my creative projects, and I recently encountered a snag that I was hoping to address. While exploring Adobe Portfolio, I noticed that some fonts available in Adobe Fonts aren't accessible.

    In particular, I was hoping to use the 'Gyst Variable' font for one of my projects, but it seems to be missing from the font library in Adobe Portfolio. Could you kindly shed some light on why certain fonts available in Adobe Fonts aren't compatible with Adobe Portfolio? I suspect that the… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

12. Font Readability / Topic

    There are various fonts available for styling purposes. However, defining fonts for reliable and safe text reading is a challenging discipline. There are many fonts and use cases where a character may look like another character. For example, 6 may look like 8 or vice versa, depending on the dimensions of the shapes and curves of the font. Also, if the text is highlighted or selected in a text field, the colour or background changes, the viewing angle or distance changes, the characters are unevenly spaced or too close, or a capital letter precedes the character. Especially, for numeric figures, but also text articles.

    There are various fonts available for styling purposes. However, defining fonts for reliable and safe text reading is a challenging discipline. There are many fonts and use cases where a character may look like another character. For example, 6 may look like 8 or vice versa, depending on the dimensions of the shapes and curves of the font. Also, if the text is highlighted or selected in a text field, the colour or background changes, the viewing angle or distance changes, the characters are unevenly spaced or too close, or a capital letter precedes the character. Especially, for numeric figures,… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

13. 頑張ってくれよ

    もう少しフォント検索に対して力を入れてほしい！検索をしてこれだ！って見つけたこと一度もないです。ほかのアプリは見つけられるのに、なぜAdobeともあろう大企業ができないの？怠慢ですか？

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

14. Improve search by image

    I tried to use the search by image feature to see if there are any Adobe fonts similar to Genty, and most of the results it gave me were symbol fonts (where each letter types an icon instead of the letter itself). When identifying the letters in my image, it got most of them correct - I just had to correct the capital T and lowercase L, which were misidentified - which means it could tell it was a normal font, not a symbol font, and yet it still suggested symbol fonts as a possible match. I followed the guidelines given (see attachment). Genty is a rounded script font. It seems your search by image needs to be improved in this area.

    I tried to use the search by image feature to see if there are any Adobe fonts similar to Genty, and most of the results it gave me were symbol fonts (where each letter types an icon instead of the letter itself). When identifying the letters in my image, it got most of them correct - I just had to correct the capital T and lowercase L, which were misidentified - which means it could tell it was a normal font, not a symbol font, and yet it still suggested symbol fonts as a possible match. I followed the guidelines… more

    •  

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

15. Improve Adobe Fonts UserVoice!

    Would be great if Adobe Fonts team could offer more clarity around your Feature Requests and Feedback system. :)

    Just a couple starting ideas to improve the use of Adobe Fonts UserVoice!

    1. Timeline for Planned & Started Features: I understand you can’t provide exact dates but it would be fantastic if you could share some kind of time scope to gauge when new features might be released.
       • Quarters: Q3 2024, Q1 2025, etc
       • or Months: 1 month, 3 months, 6months, 1 year, etc Or if that’s not possible,
       • at least the order in which planned features will be created, so we know which features are a priority and coming next?

    (There are currently 25 ideas marked as Planned so would be awesome to know which ones will be progressing first.)

    1. Tag System Clarity: Most tags are self-explanatory, like Under Review, Planned, Declined etc. But Received is a bit unclear... Does it kind of mean reviewed and closed?
    2. Maybe rename to a clearer action
    3. or add a key above forum with statuses + descriptions?

    Thanks all :D

    Would be great if Adobe Fonts team could offer more clarity around your Feature Requests and Feedback system. :)

    Just a couple starting ideas to improve the use of Adobe Fonts UserVoice!

    1. Timeline for Planned & Started Features: I understand you can’t provide exact dates but it would be fantastic if you could share some kind of time scope to gauge when new features might be released.
       • Quarters: Q3 2024, Q1 2025, etc
       • or Months: 1 month, 3 months, 6months, 1 year, etc Or if that’s not possible,
       • at least the order in which planned features will be created, so… more
    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

16. preconnect link

    Provide font preconnect link to optimise font loading (for example google fonts provide this)

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

17. LANGUAGES AND WRITING SYSTEMS > missing Bulgarian Cyrillic

    Missing Bulgarian Cyrillic filter, it's a shame.

    13 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

18. Request for Addition of Lithuanian Language in Adobe Fonts Filter

    As an enthusiastic user of your diverse range of fonts, I am writing to express a significant need for a specific language filter: Lithuanian. This language, although small in its number of speakers, carries a historical and cultural significance that is often underestimated.

    Lithuanian, belonging to the Baltic branch of the Indo-European languages, is often considered one of the oldest languages still in use today. It retains many archaic features, which are believed to be close to the original Proto-Indo-European language. This gives the Lithuanian language not only historical but also linguistic importance, as it provides valuable insights into the development and structure of early Indo-European languages.

    The resilience of the Lithuanian language is deeply tied to our national identity and pride. Over centuries, our ancestors bravely resisted numerous attempts to suppress our language, most notably during periods of Russian dominance. Despite the odds, they managed to preserve our linguistic heritage, passing down the ancient tongue from generation to generation.

    However, in spite of this rich heritage and proven resilience, Lithuanian speakers frequently face difficulties when seeking digital resources, including fonts, that correctly display the unique characters that our language utilizes. We often have to combine several language filters to ensure full character set compatibility, which is not the most efficient solution and sometimes leads to discrepancies.

    Adobe, being a global leader in digital media solutions, has a unique opportunity to bridge this gap and provide better support for the Lithuanian language. This addition would be immensely appreciated by the Lithuanian community and anyone interested in the historical and linguistic heritage of Europe.

    I am confident that this proposed addition aligns with Adobe's commitment to diversity and inclusion by ensuring equal digital representation for all languages, no matter how large or small their speaking community might be.

    Thank you for considering this request. I look forward to the potential implementation of a Lithuanian language filter in Adobe Fonts.

    As an enthusiastic user of your diverse range of fonts, I am writing to express a significant need for a specific language filter: Lithuanian. This language, although small in its number of speakers, carries a historical and cultural significance that is often underestimated.

    Lithuanian, belonging to the Baltic branch of the Indo-European languages, is often considered one of the oldest languages still in use today. It retains many archaic features, which are believed to be close to the original Proto-Indo-European language. This gives the Lithuanian language not only historical but also linguistic importance, as it provides valuable insights into the… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

19. wingdings

    No tag category for wingdings or dingbats which are icons and arrow head etc

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  2 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

20. Add and allow fonts to be "copied as base64"

    It would be great to have an option to copy a specific font (not the whole font family) as base64 string to directly use it in CSS as "src" of a @font-face rule.

    This helps to get rid of flashing of fonts that have not yet been loaded. Making this possible on per font file bases allows us to add fonts that appear above-the-fold load with the page itself. Currently, while fonts from Adobe are loading the user sees a fallback font, when load completes it swaps the font causing a Cumulative Layout Shift if a few parameters dont match (fonts have different x height, different line height at same pixel value, etc). By loading one font (A heading font file at a certain weight for example) only adds a few KBs (as base64 string) to the page. Not enough to cause a performance hit, but fixes the font flashing and Cumulative Layout Shift casued by font swapping completely.

    Right now it is possible to do by dowloading font files from the Network tab in the browser's developer tools and convering it to base64 manually. So technicaly this works perfectly. If the feature is never implemented, allowing it from the legal standpoint would be great and could be pashe 1 of implementing this feature.

    It would be great to have an option to copy a specific font (not the whole font family) as base64 string to directly use it in CSS as "src" of a @font-face rule.

    This helps to get rid of flashing of fonts that have not yet been loaded. Making this possible on per font file bases allows us to add fonts that appear above-the-fold load with the page itself. Currently, while fonts from Adobe are loading the user sees a fallback font, when load completes it swaps the font causing a Cumulative Layout Shift if a few parameters dont match… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  01. No category  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →